June 27, 2011
Highlights of this Issue
FASB and IASB Do an About-Face on the Leases ProjectNAREIT attended the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (collectively, the Boards) joint meetings May 17 to May 19, 2011 in London to observe their ongoing redeliberations
on the proposed leases standard. The Boards overturned certain key tentative decisions that would have amended the proposed leases standard related to the lessee and the lessor accounting models. At the same time, the lease accounting
proposal continues to scope out lessors of investment property reported at fair value. NAREIT reminds readers of this report that the conclusions discussed are tentative at this time.
At their May meeting, the Boards tentatively agreed that there should be only one type of lease. Thus, the Boards reverted to the original guidance for lessee accounting in the exposure draft. That guidance provides for a front-loaded expense pattern similar to interest expense on amortizing debt. In previous meetings, the Boards tentatively acknowledged that there could be more than one type of lease than what was described in the exposure draft:
Lessor Accounting The Boards did not reach a converged tentative decision on the lessor accounting model at the May meetings. Consistent with NAREIT's comment letter, the FASB voted to amend the exposure draft to allow lessors to continue applying the existing accounting model. If this tentative conclusion is finally adopted by the FASB, lessors, including all lessors of investment properties, would continue to report rental income as currently reported; avoiding any of the negative changes to lessor accounting as proposed in the exposure draft. The IASB voted to amend the leases exposure draft to only include the derecognition approach, as described in the exposure draft. Under this approach, a lessor would account for a lease at its inception as if the leased asset had been sold. The lessor would record a receivable equal to the present value of all lease payments to be received under the lease. Additionally, the lessor would record a similar amount as revenue from transfer of leased property. Similar to accounting for a sale of property, the lessor would measure the cost of the leased asset and recognize that as a cost of sale, with any difference recorded as gain or loss. Again, this accounting recognition would occur at the date of lease inception. The lease receivable would be accounted for exactly like an amortizing loan, with rent payments allocated between principal payments and interest income. As a result, no rental revenue would be reported over the term of the lease. However, companies subject to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) that report investment property at fair value under International Accounting Standard No. 40 Investment Property would not be required to apply the proposed Leases standard. Both of the tentative decisions would overturn the hybrid approach to lessor accounting included in the leases exposure draft (i.e., derecognition and performance obligation approaches, respectively). In light of the Boards' change in course with respect to the decisions on lessee and lessor accounting, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and NAREIT, along with other Chamber members, submitted a comment letter to the Boards voicing concern over the recent tentative conclusions. The letter highlighted issues where the Boards should spend further time in redeliberations before finalizing the standard. Among the issues presented, NAREIT members will be particularly interested in the following views presented in the letter:
Given the potential divergence in views on the accounting model for lessors, the Boards reconvened in London from June 13 to June 15, 2011. NAREIT attended these joint Board meetings to observe their ongoing redeliberations. The Boards continued to explore whether there should be one or more lessor accounting models; however, no tentative decisions were reached. Next Steps The Boards plan to continue to discuss lessor accounting at their next joint Board meetings in July 2011. The Boards have not reached a decision regarding whether they will re-expose the final standard for public comment. Additionally, the Boards have not selected an effective date for the proposed leases standard. FASB Finalizes Remaining Issues as it Commences with Drafting its Standard on Investment PropertiesThe FASB has continued to develop a standard in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) that would require certain lessors to report investment properties at fair value, and thus be outside the scope of the
proposed leases standard. However, as the FASB has considered its Investment Properties standard, two major differences between current FASB thinking and the existing guidance in IFRS (International Accounting Standard No. 40 Investment
Property (IAS 40)) have surfaced:
The FASB staff has developed the following criteria that an entity would have to meet to be considered within the scope of the FASB's Investment Properties standard:
NAREIT has communicated the Board's tentative decision to apply an entity-based approach to determining the scope of the standard to its global partners – member organizations of the Real Estate Equity Securitization Alliance (REESA). REESA is made up of seven representative real estate organizations around the world grounded in one or more facets of securitized real estate equity. REESA's broad mission is to improve the opportunities for investment in securitized real estate equity around the globe. The REESA member organizations are:
On June 13, 2011, NAREIT attended the FASB's education session for the members of the IASB in London. No formal decisions were made during the meeting. At the current time, it is unclear whether the IASB would:
The FASB Staff has commenced drafting the exposure draft, with FASB intending to issue it for public comment in July, with a finalized standard to be issued by the end of 2011. FASB and IASB Decide to Re-expose the Revenue Recognition ProposalNAREIT staff attended the
FASB and the IASB joint meetings from June 13 – 15 in London to observe their ongoing redeliberations of the Boards' joint project on revenue recognition.
NAREIT Meets with SEC Staff to Discuss FFO and MFFOOn Apr. 21, 2011, NAREIT met with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance to discuss current Funds From Operations (FFO) reporting practices, as well as the introduction of Modified FFO
(MFFO) by the Investment Program Association (IPA).
Representing NAREIT at the meeting were Steve Wechsler, president & CEO, Tony Edwards, executive vice president & general counsel, George Yungmann, senior vice president, financial standards, and Christopher Drula, senior director, financial standards. The SEC staff included the Assistant Director of the Division of Corporation Finance and senior legal and accounting staff. The SEC staff said that their clear focus over the next year would be on ensuring that non-GAAP measures are presented in accordance with Regulation G with a strong emphasis on the narrative disclosures required. NAREIT Comments on the SEC's Proposed Rule Impacting the Issuance of UPREIT Debt and Meets with the SECPursuant to requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Reform Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed to replace the current "investment grade standard", currently required
for use of short-form shelf registration on Form S-3, with an alternative standard that may create unintended roadblocks to a REIT's access to the public debt capital markets. If the proposed guidance were adopted in its current form, many
REITs that have been able to access the public debt capital markets (through the use by their operating partnership subsidiaries of the short-form shelf registration process under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on Form S-3 for
primary offerings) would no longer be able to issue debt securities through this efficient process and could be compelled to issue debt through private placements.
On May 20, 2011, NAREIT staff met with SEC staff to discuss our concerns with the proposal. NAREIT staff had a constructive discussion about possible modifications to the SEC's proposal. While the SEC staff did not commit to any changes, NAREIT believes that they are open to consider our recommendations. FASB and IASB Continue Deliberations on Accounting for Financial Instruments ProjectsThe FASB has been reconsidering certain aspects of the proposed changes to accounting for financial instruments. The tentative changes center on the following areas: classification and subsequent measurement, credit impairment, interest
income recognition, and hedge accounting. The IASB has moved forward without the FASB in its deliberations on classification and subsequent measurement and hedge accounting, while the boards issued a joint proposal on credit impairment.
The Board agreed to include the following criteria that are specific to the classification of financial liabilities: An entity would measure at amortized cost financial liabilities meeting the characteristics of the instrument, except when either of the following conditions is met:
The FASB's approach to measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities is not converged with the approach taken by the IASB. Under the IASB's proposed model, there would be only two categories:
The FASB and the IASB continue to debate a converged credit impairment model for financial assets. At the joint board meetings in May, the Boards considered the feedback that they received, which consistently rejected the Boards' proposal, and encouraged a new converged model. As a result, the Boards have moved away from pursuing an approach that divided a portfolio of financial assets between a good book and a bad book. Instead, the Boards are considering a new approach where classification would determine the credit impairment as credit quality deteriorates during a financial asset's life cycle. Classification of financial assets would be made into one of three buckets:
Next Steps No final decisions were reached by the Boards with respect to this new approach. NAREIT anticipates that the model will be debated further at the July 2011 joint Board meetings. Offsetting Financial Assets and Liabilities On June 14, 2011, NAREIT attended the joint Board meeting where the FASB and IASB debated whether the offsetting model should be based on an unconditional right of set-off or a conditional right of set-off. The Boards did not reach a converged tentative decision. The IASB favored the unconditional right of set-off approach, while the FASB supporting a conditional right of set-off approach. For more information, see IASB Agenda Paper 5A/FASB Agenda Paper 15A. The unconditional right of set-off approach is consistent with that which was discussed in the FASB and IASB exposure drafts (Offsetting, and Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, respectively) issued on January 28, 2011. Under this approach, a company would be required to offset a recognized financial asset and a financial liability if it:
Next steps Once the Boards complete their respective projects on Accounting for Financial Instruments, they plan to reconcile any differences before issuing a final joint standard by the end of 2011. FASB and IASB Finalize Joint Convergence Project on Fair Value MeasurementOn May 12, 2011, the Boards finalized their Joint Convergence Project that will achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. To view the full Accounting Standards Update,
click here. While this guidance represents a new standard for IFRS reporting entities, the guidance will be similar to what U.S. GAAP reporting entities implemented previously under Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. However, there were some changes to the language used in the updated literature to converge with IFRS. Additionally, the FASB clarified certain aspects of existing U.S. GAAP and made some amendments relating to:
FASB and IASB Align Financial Statement Presentation of Other Comprehensive IncomeOn June 16, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). To view ASU 2011-05 in its entirety,
click here. Also on June 16, the IASB issued an amendment to International Accounting Standard No. 1, Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1). The new guidance issued by the Boards is intended to align the reporting
requirements for OCI, and thereby increase comparability of financial reporting.
For entities not registered with the SEC, ASU 2011-05 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2012, including interim periods thereafter. Full retrospective application is required, and early adoption is permitted. FASB Issues Amended Guidance for Determining Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt RestructuringOn Apr. 5, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor's Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (ASU 2011-02). To view ASU 2011-02 in its
entirety,
click here. ASU 2011-02 provides further clarification to existing guidance that addresses whether a creditor should account for a debt modification as a troubled debt restructuring. The new guidance may impact REITs (especially
mortgage REITs) that restructure receivables with debtors.
For entities not registered with the SEC, ASU 2011-02 is effective for annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2012, including interim periods within those periods. Early adoption is permitted. SEC Looks at Condorsement as Possible Way to Converge U.S. GAAP with IFRSOn May 26, 2011, the SEC Office of the Chief Accountant issued a staff paper entitled "Exploring a Possible Method of Incorporation" (the staff paper) that further analyzes condorsement as a possible method to converge U.S. GAAP
with IFRS. To view the staff paper,
click here. The SEC has invited constituents to provide feedback on the staff paper. To comment,
click here. Those members who wish to participate in developing NAREIT's comment letter should contact Christopher Drula at
cdrula@nareit.com.
Under the condorsement approach, the FASB would continue to exist, but in a different role. As further discussed below, the FASB would provide input to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in the development and improvement of financial reporting standards. The idea of having the FASB specifically involved at the forefront of international financial standards development would alleviate concerns in the U.S. that the FASB's views would not otherwise be considered in the IASB process. It would also ensure that the FASB's final conclusions would not diverge generally from the final guidance issued by the IASB. Further, the condorsement protocol would provide the SEC and the FASB with the ability to modify or supplement IFRS when in the public interest and necessary for the protection of investors (i.e., a "US-only IFRS"). Under this approach, the SEC would continue to oversee the FASB and maintain its ability to issue accounting principles and regulations to be followed by companies registered in the U.S. Additionally, the SEC would provide its perspectives to the IASB as well as the IASB's oversight board (i.e., the IFRS Foundation Monitoring Board). In order to achieve ultimate convergence, the FASB would undertake a transition plan that would last between five and seven years. The FASB would evaluate a full inventory of similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Afterwards, the FASB would classify the financial standards in three categories prior to converging with IFRS on a standard-by-standard basis:
In the staff paper, the SEC staff evaluated the benefits and risks of adopting the condorsement approach. The benefits of pursuing condorsement specified by the SEC include that the approach:
The SEC has issued an invitation to comment on the staff paper, as well as other possible mechanisms previously discussed to achieve a global set of generally accepted accounting principles. The comment deadline is July 31, 2011. ContactFor further information, please contact George Yungmann at gyungmann@nareit.com or Christopher Drula at cdrula@nareit.com. |
||
NAREIT® is the worldwide representative voice for REITs and listed real estate companies with an interest in U.S. real estate and capital markets. Members are REITs and other businesses that own, operate and manage income-producing real
estate, as well as those firms and individuals who advise, study and service those businesses. NAREIT is the exclusive registered trademark of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ®, 1875 I St., NW, Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20006-5413. Follow us on REIT.com.
Copyright© 2011 by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc.® All rights reserved. This information is solely educational in nature and is not intended by NAREIT to serve as the primary basis for any investment decision. NAREIT is not acting as an investment adviser, investment fiduciary, broker, dealer or other market participant, and no offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security or real estate investment is being made. Investments and solicitations for investment must be made directly through an agent, employee or representative of a particular investment or fund and cannot be made through NAREIT. NAREIT does not allow any agent, employee or representative to personally solicit any investment or accept any monies to be invested in a particular security or real estate investment. All REIT data are derived from, and apply only to, publicly traded securities. While such data are believed to be reliable when prepared or provided, such data are subject to change or restatement. NAREIT does not warrant or guarantee such data for accuracy or completeness, and shall not be liable under any legal theory for such data or any errors or omissions therein. See http://reit.com/TermsofUse.aspx for important information regarding this data, the underlying assumptions and the limitations of NAREIT's liability therefor, all of which are incorporated by reference herein. Performance results are provided only as a barometer or measure of past performance, and future values will fluctuate from those used in the underlying data. Any investment returns or performance data (past, hypothetical or otherwise) shown herein or in such data are not necessarily indicative of future returns or performance. Before an investment is made in any security, fund or investment, investors are strongly advised to request a copy of the prospectus or other disclosure or investment documentation and read it carefully. Such prospectus or other information contains important information about a security's, fund's or other investment's objectives and strategies, risks and expenses. Investors should read all such information carefully before making an investment decision or investing any funds. Investors should consult with their investment fiduciary or other market professional before making any investment in any security, fund or other investment. |
||
|